When inadequate security leads to an assault, the property owner may be legally responsible.
When Security Failures Cause Harm
Property owners who invite the public onto their premises have a duty to provide reasonable security. When inadequate security leads to an assault or robbery, the owner may be liable.
These negligent-security claims hold owners accountable for foreseeable harm.
The Foreseeability Requirement
A central question is whether the crime was foreseeable — for example, because of prior incidents in the area or on the property. Foreseeable risks require reasonable precautions.
Records of past crimes and complaints are often decisive.
Common Negligent-Security Settings
Apartment complexes, parking garages, hotels, bars, and shopping centers are frequent settings for negligent-security claims when lighting, locks, or guards are inadequate.
The specific failures vary, but the duty to protect invitees is constant.
What Reasonable Security Looks Like
Adequate lighting, functioning locks and gates, surveillance, and trained security staff are common measures. What is reasonable depends on the property and its risks.
An owner who ignores obvious risks may be found negligent.
Proving the Owner Should Have Acted
Evidence of prior crimes, ignored complaints, broken security equipment, and industry standards shows the owner should have done more.
Building this record is the core of a negligent-security case.
Pursuing a Negligent-Security Claim
These cases are complex and require prompt investigation to preserve footage and records. Acting quickly protects the evidence.
A free case review can explain whether a negligent-security claim applies to your situation.
This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Laws change and every case is different. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed California attorney.